<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
 <title>GeekSugar</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com</link>
 <description>Geek is chic</description>
 <language>en</language>
 <atom:link href="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/Photoshop+Disasters/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
 <title>Website of the Day: Photoshop Disasters</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/1141661</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/1141661&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=158  src=&#039;http://media.onsugar.com/files/upl0/1/15111/13_2008/castles_0.large.jpg&#039;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Remember when you used to wait for the dentist as a kid and ate up as much &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.highlights.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Highlights&lt;/a&gt; as humanly possible before your appointment? You were all, I do understand where Goofus went wrong and Gallant was right. And then you got to the two pictures and had to find what was wrong with the second picture? &lt;a href=&quot;http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Photoshop Disasters&lt;/a&gt; is kind of like that. Except it&#039;s just one picture, and you get to scan the pics and figure out were the photoshopper went wrong. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Sometimes it&#039;s putting a &lt;a href=&quot;http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2008-03-10T18%3A36%3A00-07%3A00&amp;amp;max-results=8&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;three-handed woman&lt;/a&gt; on a book cover, sometimes there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2008/03/street-kings-trigger-debate-rages-on.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;no finger on the trigger&lt;/a&gt; on a movie poster, and my personal fave, photoshops &lt;a href=&quot;http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2008/03/diario-sportivo-as-i-wasnt-expecting.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;so hilariously bad&lt;/a&gt; that you resent the graphic designer for thinking you&#039;re so dumb you wouldn&#039;t have caught it. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photoshop Disasters won&#039;t search the web for your first attempts at the cloning tool (been there), they seek out commercial stuff in the mainstream, where someone was actually &lt;i&gt;hired&lt;/i&gt; to make &lt;a href=&quot;http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2008/03/jordache-attack-of-pod-people.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Heidi Klum look like an alien&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/1141661#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Website of the Day">Website of the Day</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Photoshop">Photoshop</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Photoshop Disasters">Photoshop Disasters</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:05:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/1141661</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Busted! Calling Out Photoshop on the Streets</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/2688100</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/2688100&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=62  src=&#039;http://media.onsugar.com/files/upl1/1/15111/03_2009/2814187ba6d289cf_photoshopped-ads.large.jpg&#039;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;What should we do as a society to combat unrealistic images of celebrities due to the widespread use of Photoshop? Rant and rave on a blog? Publicly shame them on sites like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/1141661&quot; &gt;Photoshop Disasters&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or, you could take it back to the streets, as was done on an ad of celebs in a train station in Berlin; the geeky street artist &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woostercollective.com/2009/01/photoshop_adbusting_in_belin.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;affixed a Photoshop menu and commands&lt;/a&gt; onto the smooth faces of Christina Aguilera and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popsugar.com/tag/britney+spears&quot; &gt;Britney Spears&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Public comment plus geekiness? I&#039;m all for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&#039;font-size:10px !important;&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.woostercollective.com/2009/01/photoshop_adbusting_in_belin.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/2688100#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Photoshop">Photoshop</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Ads">Ads</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:00:37 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/2688100</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dane Cook&#039;s Photoshop Rant: Was It Justified? </title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/1863006</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/1863006&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=108 height=160  src=&#039;http://media.onsugar.com/files/upl1/1/15111/33_2008/bfg.large.jpg&#039;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Let&#039;s just say I tired of Dane Cook&#039;s shtick sometime around 2005, but his recent rant about Photoshop put him back on my geeky radar. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The actor/comedian &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/12/dane-cook-slams-own-movie_n_118475.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ranted about the photoshopping&lt;/a&gt; and general artwork for his new film, &lt;a href=&quot;http://buzzsugar.com/tag/My+Best+Friend%27s+Girl+movie&quot; &gt;My Best Friend&#039;s Girl&lt;/a&gt;, basically calling out the shoddiness of the work and how differently it portrays his own looks and the feel of the movie.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Usually we notice runaway photoshopping of females, like &lt;a href=&quot;http://defamer.com/5030197/keira-knightleys-breasts-officially-unmarketable&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Keira Knightley&#039;s blown-up chest&lt;/a&gt; or the lightening of &lt;a href=&quot;http://bellasugar.com/1848313&quot; &gt;Beyonce&#039;s skin&lt;/a&gt;, so it&#039;s interesting that a male celebrity is up in arms. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Choice complaints of Cook&#039;s list? &quot;They should have called Donnie Hoyle and had him give a tutorial using &quot;You Suck at Photoshop&quot; templates.&quot; And &quot;It looks like I&#039;m wearing Maybelline Water Shine Diamonds Liquid Lipstick.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You be the judge; as Cook says, his skin has been smoothed to an unrealistic porcelain finish, but is it worthy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/1141661&quot; &gt;Photoshop Disasters&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/1863006#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Photoshop">Photoshop</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/Dane Cook">Dane Cook</category>
 <category domain="http://www.teamsugar.com/tag/my best friend&#039;s girl">my best friend&#039;s girl</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:00:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/1863006</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
