<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
 <title>GeekSugar</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
 <atom:link href="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/FCC/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
 <copyright>Copyright 1976-2012 Sugar Inc.  All rights reserved.</copyright>
 
<item>
 <title>911 May Soon Accept Text Messages</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/Next-Generation-911-Accepts-Text-Messages-12208274</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/Next-Generation-911-Accepts-Text-Messages-12208274&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=111 height=160  src=&#039;http://media4.onsugar.com/files/2010/11/47/2/192/1922507/10f48046a471d5b3_text911.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Text messaging is a fast and effective way to communicate, so why can&#039;t you text the police? Soon, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/11/texting-911-coming-to-a-mobile-phone-near-you.ars&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/11/texting-911-coming-to-a-mobile-phone-near-you.ars&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;you may be able to&lt;/a&gt;. While the current emergency system isn&#039;t equipped to handle 911 texts - only voice calls - the FCC presented new rules for a revamped 911 system (called &quot;Next Generation 911&quot;) that would be capable of accepting text messages, photos, and video messages. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Learn more about the potential service &lt;a href=&quot;/Next-Generation-911-Accepts-Text-Messages-12208274#read-more&quot; title=&quot;Read more.&quot; class=&quot;read-more&quot;&gt;after the jump.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/Next-Generation-911-Accepts-Text-Messages-12208274#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/911">911</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/FCC">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/emergency">emergency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/next generation 911">next generation 911</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:00:34 PST</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kristen Hawley</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/Next-Generation-911-Accepts-Text-Messages-12208274</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FCC Grants Use of Unlicensed Airwaves: What It Means For You</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/FCC-Approves-Broadcast-White-Space-11172274</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/FCC-Approves-Broadcast-White-Space-11172274&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=106 height=160  src=&#039;http://media4.onsugar.com/files/2010/09/38/4/192/1922507/98f887e4d706e89c_broadcast.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;This week, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/23/AR2010092306453.html&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/23/AR2010092306453.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;FCC approved the use of unlicensed airwaves&lt;/a&gt; or &quot;white space&quot; in hopes of creating newer, faster Internet connections. These previously unused spaces are now a new market for high-speed Internet connections. The order was approved unanimously by a five-person board; Microsoft and Google (among others) had been vocal in their support of the measure. The actual &quot;white spaces&quot; are parts of the broadcast spectrum between television channels, and able to host powerful signals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Find out more about this ruling &lt;a href=&quot;/FCC-Approves-Broadcast-White-Space-11172274#read-more&quot; title=&quot;Read more.&quot; class=&quot;read-more&quot;&gt;after the break.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/FCC-Approves-Broadcast-White-Space-11172274#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/FCC">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/broadband">broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:47:12 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/FCC-Approves-Broadcast-White-Space-11172274</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Should Phone Companies Be Required to Notify You For Unusually High Charges? </title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/Should-Your-Phone-Company-Notify-You-Your-Bill-Going-High-8386116</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/Should-Your-Phone-Company-Notify-You-Your-Bill-Going-High-8386116&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=147  src=&#039;http://media2.onsugar.com/files/2010/05/19/2/192/1922507/c65532f732a48a36_phone-bill.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ve all heard the stories of bill shock when it comes to an unexpectedly huge phone bill - people who have traveled out of the country without a roaming plan, or those who unknowingly dropped a data plan, only to be slammed with a bill in &lt;a onclick=&quot;if (window.shopSensePFlag===undefined) {this.href=this.href.replace(/pid=\d+/,&#039;pid=puid15111&#039;);}return true;&quot; href=&quot;http://www.shopstyle.com/browse/The-Hundreds#pid=22161&amp;amp;pdata=onsugar1922507,8386116&quot; class=&quot;ss_inline_link auto_link_filter no_shopsense_url_rewrite&quot; title=&quot;Shop for The Hundreds&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the hundreds&lt;/a&gt;, if not thousands of dollars. Yesterday, the FCC announced it was seeking public opinion over &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/12/technology/12fcc.html?ref=technology&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.nytimes.com/2010/05/12/technology/12fcc.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;whether or not customers should be notified if their phone charges are unusually high&lt;/a&gt;. To be clear, this would not extend to customers going a few text messages over budget -it&#039;s reserved only for those special case scenarios where large amounts of money are at stake. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;European carriers are already required to notify customers when they&#039;re incurring large roaming charges or come close to exceeding their monthly data plans, but no such law exists in the US. I&#039;m sure parents would appreciate a heads-up if an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/Teen-Needs-Surgery-Too-Much-Texting-Tips-Preventing-Carpal-Tunnel-Syndrome-7858272&quot; &gt;over-zealous teen&lt;/a&gt; texts too much, and I would have loved a notice before I racked up $200 worth of charges when I was in Canada recently. To support (or not support) the measure and for more details, visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fcc.gov/&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.fcc.gov/&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the FCC&#039;s website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;form action=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/Should-Your-Phone-Company-Notify-You-Your-Bill-Going-High-8386116&quot;  method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;poll_view_voting_8386116&quot; onsubmit=&quot;ajaxSubmit(this, false); return false;&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;poll&quot;&gt;  &lt;div class=&quot;vote-form&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;choices&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;&lt;div id=&#039;poll-title&#039;&gt;Should Phone Companies Be Required to Notify You For Unusually High Charges? &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-0-8386116&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-0-8386116&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;0-8386116&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Yes, they should be required to notify you.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-1-8386116&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-1-8386116&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;1-8386116&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; No, it is the customer&#039;s responsibility to monitor usage.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[nid]&quot; id=&quot;edit-nid&quot; value=&quot;8386116&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;span class=&#039;button&#039;&gt;&lt;span class=&#039;button_copy&#039;&gt;&lt;input class=&#039;fancybutton&#039; type=&#039;submit&#039; name=&quot;op&quot; value=&quot;Vote&quot;  class=&quot;form-submit&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_token]&quot; id=&quot;edit-form_token&quot; value=&quot;6b1c97eb8d6e4a04c05a4bbdfe4a9061&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_id]&quot; id=&quot;edit-form_id&quot; value=&quot;poll_view_voting&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/Should-Your-Phone-Company-Notify-You-Your-Bill-Going-High-8386116#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/FCC">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/cell phone bill">cell phone bill</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 03:47:31 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/Should-Your-Phone-Company-Notify-You-Your-Bill-Going-High-8386116</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What Is Net Neutrality, Anyway?</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/What-Net-Neutrality-8020941</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/What-Net-Neutrality-8020941&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=107 height=160  src=&#039;http://media2.onsugar.com/files/2010/04/14/2/192/1922507/f93100a54dd6aa08_net-neutrality.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a decision announced earlier today, a Federal Court of Appeals says &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/technology/07net.html?hp&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/technology/07net.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the FCC cannot require net neutrality&lt;/a&gt;. The decision referred specifically to a case against cable provider Comcast, who was accused of slowing down access to certain sites. In 2008, the FCC issued &quot;net neutrality&quot; rules, meaning all Internet content must be treated equally by network providers. Now, this ruling against neutrality means this is not the case - and that network providers &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; treat some sites differently than others.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While this decision will curb some illegal file-sharing (this is why the case was brought to court in the first place), it has far-reaching implications. To hear how this ruling could affect you (and your cable bill!), &lt;a href=&quot;/What-Net-Neutrality-8020941#read-more&quot; title=&quot;Read more.&quot; class=&quot;read-more&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/What-Net-Neutrality-8020941#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/FCC">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/Net Neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:45:10 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/What-Net-Neutrality-8020941</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is the iPad Launch Delayed Already?</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/iPads-Launch-Already-Delayed-7586058</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/iPads-Launch-Already-Delayed-7586058&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=132 height=160  src=&#039;http://media1.onsugar.com/files/2010/03/09/1/192/1922507/077e85d55195a99a_ipad.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to an Associated Press report, the launch of Apple&#039;s anticipated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/ipad&quot; &gt;iPad&lt;/a&gt; may &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gZGhaBQh2QMNgPpxMiPkN4ZgYcXgD9E625H00&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gZGhaBQh2QMNgPpxMiPkN4ZgYcXgD9E625H00&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;be delayed until April&lt;/a&gt;. The report cites a technology analyst&#039;s note of an &quot;unspecified production problem&quot; affecting Apple&#039;s Taiwan-based supplier. Here&#039;s more:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The report says that Apple will &quot;likely limit the launch region to the U.S. and the number of units available to roughly 300,000 in the month of March, far lower than the company&#039;s initial estimate of 1 million units.&quot;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This all sounds a bit suspicious to me. Sure, this could be a technical problem, but the iPad&#039;s launch has been clouded by several different issues. First, there was the announcement that the iPad would begin shipping in &quot;about 60 days,&quot; a formula Apple hasn&#039;t used before. I definitely expected the eventual announcement of a launch date, but even now, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/ipad/&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.apple.com/ipad/&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Apple&#039;s site&lt;/a&gt; says that WiFi models will ship in &quot;late March&quot; and 3G models in &quot;early April.&quot; Plus, there&#039;s still the question of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/Apple-Changes-Software-Allow-3G-Based-Apps-7206796&quot; &gt;FCC authorization&lt;/a&gt;. Could that be causing the delay?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/iPads-Launch-Already-Delayed-7586058#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/Apple">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/iPad">iPad</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/FCC">FCC</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:15:02 PST</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/iPads-Launch-Already-Delayed-7586058</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The FCC Asks Questions About Google Voice</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/Google-Voice-Phone-Company-5572393</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/Google-Voice-Phone-Company-5572393&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=131  src=&#039;http://media3.onsugar.com/files/ons1/192/1922507/41_2009/b8489db003001270_google-voice.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google Voice, the Internet voice application that functions similarly to a phone, blurs the line between the two forms of communication. Is it the same as phone service? Google says no, but a claim from telephone provider AT&amp;amp;T says it is. Now the Federal Communications Commission is on the case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Last week, the FCC sent a letter to Google, asking them to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/09/AR2009100904385.html&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/09/AR2009100904385.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;explain how Google Voice works&lt;/a&gt;. The main reason? The FCC is trying to discern whether or not the app should be considered a phone service, subjecting it to more stringent regulations and fees. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This Summer, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/3546962&quot; &gt;most of you said you&#039;d signed up for a Google Voice account&lt;/a&gt;. (If you still haven&#039;t, check out my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/3568609&quot; &gt;top five reasons for using Google Voice&lt;/a&gt;.) The FCC launched the probe because of Google&#039;s policy restricting calls to certain rural locations. Google argues that the restrictions are in place because of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/10/sex-conference-calls-and-outdated-fcc.html&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/10/sex-conference-calls-and-outdated-fcc.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/10/sex-conference-calls-and-outdated-fcc.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;high termination rates charged by carriers in these areas&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To find out what Google&#039;s position is on this situation is, just &lt;/p&gt;
read more.

Their official &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/10/sex-conference-calls-and-outdated-fcc.html&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/10/sex-conference-calls-and-outdated-fcc.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/10/sex-conference-calls-and-outdated-fcc.html&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;position on the matter&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Google Voice is a free web application, one intended to supplement and enhance existing phone lines, not replace them. The goal of Google Voice is to provide a useful, unified communications tool.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

If they are determined to be a phone company and mandated to make the service available in such areas, Google says the future of the free-of-charge application is in jeopardy. </description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/Google-Voice-Phone-Company-5572393#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/Google">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/FCC">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/Google Voice">Google Voice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/ATT">ATT</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:47:54 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/Google-Voice-Phone-Company-5572393</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Are You Excited About the Android Phone?</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/FCC-Approves-HTCs-Dream-Phone-First-Run-Googles-Android-Platform-1878658</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/FCC-Approves-HTCs-Dream-Phone-First-Run-Googles-Android-Platform-1878658&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=102  src=&#039;http://media3.onsugar.com/files/upl1/1/15111/34_2008/android.preview.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Finally! So, it looks like HTC&#039;s Dream - aka the first cell phone to use Google&#039;s awesome-looking &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/android&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Android platform&lt;/a&gt; - is going to become a reality: the&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/google/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=210101836&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;FCC has approved it&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The promises of Android are tempting enough to make me consider giving up my iPhone (well, add it to my cell phone collection maybe) - the shortlist of features includes WiFi, 3G, and Bluetooth - and check out this &lt;a href=&quot;http://gizmodo.com/5038586/an-in+depth-video-tour-of-android-09-an-almost-great-almost-os&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;walkthrough video&lt;/a&gt; for more. Considering it&#039;s being made by HTC, whose quickly building its reputation for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/touch+diamond&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;good-lookin&#039; phones&lt;/a&gt;, the pot gets even sweeter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But what do you think: Is this a phone that will rival your lust for iPhones and BlackBerrys?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/magazine/16-07/ff_android&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;form action=&quot;/FCC-Approves-HTCs-Dream-Phone-First-Run-Googles-Android-Platform-1878658&quot;  method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;poll&quot;&gt;  &lt;div class=&quot;vote-form&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;choices&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Are You Excited About the Android Phone?&lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-0-1878658&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-0-1878658&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;0-1878658&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Yes, I&#039;m super excited for HTC&#039;s Android phone!&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-1-1878658&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-1-1878658&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;1-1878658&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; No, I haven&#039;t seen enough to get me excited yet.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-2-1878658&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-2-1878658&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;2-1878658&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Something else. See my comment below!&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[nid]&quot; id=&quot;edit-nid&quot; value=&quot;1878658&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;span class=&#039;button&#039;&gt;&lt;span class=&#039;button_copy&#039;&gt;&lt;input class=&#039;fancybutton&#039; type=&#039;submit&#039; name=&quot;op&quot; value=&quot;Vote&quot;  class=&quot;form-submit&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_id]&quot; id=&quot;edit-form_id&quot; value=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/FCC-Approves-HTCs-Dream-Phone-First-Run-Googles-Android-Platform-1878658#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/Poll">Poll</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/FCC">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/HTC">HTC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/Android">Android</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/HTC Dream">HTC Dream</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:03:59 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/FCC-Approves-HTCs-Dream-Phone-First-Run-Googles-Android-Platform-1878658</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Do You Think Product Integration Should Stop Trying to Be So Sneaky?</title>
 <link>http://www.buzzsugar.com/Do-You-Think-Product-Integration-Should-Stop-Trying-So-Sneaky-1743539</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzsugar.com/Do-You-Think-Product-Integration-Should-Stop-Trying-So-Sneaky-1743539&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=106 height=160  src=&#039;http://media2.onsugar.com/files/upl1/1/13839/26_2008/48161.xlarger.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;The Writers Guild of America is sick of having to write storylines in TV shows solely to feature a product or brand, so much so that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117988068.html?categoryid=14&amp;amp;cs=1&amp;amp;nid=2563&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the group is bringing the issue to the FCC&lt;/a&gt;. The WGA is hoping to make it so that any kind of advertisement is blatantly disclosed, and writers don&#039;t have to sneakily work products into a plotline where they maybe don&#039;t make sense. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;geeksugar has questioned &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/slideshow/1682509&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the product integration on Gossip Girl&lt;/a&gt;, noting that the show is clearly required to use Verizon products, but the gadgets used by the characters don&#039;t make sense for their characters. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WGA West president Patric Verrone explains that with product integration, &quot;the hope is that consumers, not expecting to find a commercial within their program, will fail to realize they are actually being advertised to. This practice exploits the emotional connection viewers have with shows and their characters in order to sell a product.&quot; He goes on to claim that audiences are alienated by these sneaky tactics, though &quot;an industry source&quot; counters that &quot;product placement has not been an issue for viewers.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think? Should shows stop trying to work in products, sometimes at the expense of consistency within the story? Or does it not bother you?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Photo courtesy of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://cwtv.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;CW&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;form action=&quot;/Do-You-Think-Product-Integration-Should-Stop-Trying-So-Sneaky-1743539&quot;  method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;poll&quot;&gt;  &lt;div class=&quot;vote-form&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;choices&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Do You Think Product Integration Should Stop Trying to Be So Sneaky?&lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-0-1743539&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-0-1743539&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;0-1743539&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Yes. Product placement is so obnoxious when they try to &quot;work it in.&quot;&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-1-1743539&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-1-1743539&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;1-1743539&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Maybe. I can definitely see how it would be troublesome for writers.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-2-1743539&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-2-1743539&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;2-1743539&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Nah. It doesn&#039;t bug me.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label for=&quot;id-3-1743539&quot; class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; id=&quot;id-3-1743539&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;3-1743539&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Other (tell us below)&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[nid]&quot; id=&quot;edit-nid&quot; value=&quot;1743539&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;span class=&#039;button&#039;&gt;&lt;span class=&#039;button_copy&#039;&gt;&lt;input class=&#039;fancybutton&#039; type=&#039;submit&#039; name=&quot;op&quot; value=&quot;Vote&quot;  class=&quot;form-submit&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_id]&quot; id=&quot;edit-form_id&quot; value=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.buzzsugar.com/Do-You-Think-Product-Integration-Should-Stop-Trying-So-Sneaky-1743539#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.buzzsugar.com/tag/Buzz Poll">Buzz Poll</category>
 <category domain="http://www.buzzsugar.com/tag/FCC">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.buzzsugar.com/tag/Product Placement">Product Placement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.buzzsugar.com/tag/Gossip Girl">Gossip Girl</category>
 <category domain="http://www.buzzsugar.com/tag/WGA">WGA</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:30:16 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BuzzSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.buzzsugar.com/Do-You-Think-Product-Integration-Should-Stop-Trying-So-Sneaky-1743539</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No Cell Phones On Planes, FCC Says</title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/Cell-Phones-Planes-FCC-Says-198555</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/Cell-Phones-Planes-FCC-Says-198555&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=159 height=105  src=&#039;http://media1.onsugar.com/files/users/1/15111/14_2007/AA037338.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Despite recent talk about the future of cell phones on planes, the FCC has decided to keep a rule in place that requires cell phones to be turned off during airline flights. According to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/tech/wireless/phones/2007-04-03-fcc-downs-cellphones_N.htm?csp=34&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;AP,&lt;/a&gt; the reasoning behind the decision was technical. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;These days it&#039;s impossible to get on a bus without at least one person hollering into their cellphone, invading the private space of everyone around them,&quot; one member of the public wrote in an e-mail to the FCC. &quot;That&#039;s bad enough when one can get off in 10 minutes. To have to suffer through HOURS of such torture, with nowhere to go and miserably cramped conditions - someone is going to explode.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unlike the Federal Aviation Administration, which bans the use of cellphones and other portable electronic devices for fear they will interfere with navigational and communications systems, the FCC&#039;s concern is interference with other cellphone signals on the ground.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In January, the &lt;a href=&quot;109291&quot; &gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt; reported that Emirates, the Dubai-based airline, installed satellite-based technology that allows voice calls and text messaging on one of its Boeing 777’s late last year and expects to begin offering the service to passengers on an international route. Emirates said calls will work at altitudes above 9,800 feet to avoid potential interference with land systems. The downside is users will reportedly be billed at $3 to $3.50 a minute for outbound and inbound calls.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/Cell-Phones-Planes-FCC-Says-198555#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/News">News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/cell phone">cell phone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/plane">plane</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/FCC">FCC</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 03:25:11 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/Cell-Phones-Planes-FCC-Says-198555</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Colbert&#039;s Solution to the Cell Phone Radiation Problem: Burritos </title>
 <link>http://www.geeksugar.com/Stephen-Colbert-Cell-Phone-Radiation-Video-17573476</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/Stephen-Colbert-Cell-Phone-Radiation-Video-17573476&quot;&gt;&lt;img  width=160 height=160  src=&#039;http://media4.onsugar.com/files/2011/06/22/4/192/1922507/eab4344dcb914389_colbert.large.jpg&#039; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;Leave it to &lt;a class=&quot;sugar_inline_link&quot; title=&quot;Latest photos and news for Stephen Colbert&quot; href=&quot;http://www.tressugar.com/Stephen-Colbert&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Stephen Colbert&lt;/a&gt; to discover the most resourceful solution for blocking the low-grade radiation emitted from cell phones - soak up the harmful waves with frozen food. The FCC&#039;s cell phone guidelines recommend keeping the device &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geeksugar.com/Prevent-Cell-Phone-Radiation-Exposure-FAQs-17570797&quot; &gt;15 mm away from the body&lt;/a&gt;, which is conveniently the width of a frozen burrito! Watch Stephen &quot;cook&quot; lunch while catching up with his grandma below. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;background-color:#000000;width:520px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;padding:4px;&quot;&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:video:colbertnation.com:388057&quot; width=&quot;512&quot; height=&quot;288&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowFullScreen=&quot;true&quot; allowScriptAccess=&quot;always&quot; base=&quot;.&quot; flashVars=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/388057/june-01-2011/harmful-cell-phones&quot; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/388057/june-01-2011/harmful-cell-phones&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Colbert Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Tags: &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/&#039; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot;&gt;Colbert Report Full Episodes&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.indecisionforever.com/&#039; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.indecisionforever.com/&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot;&gt;Political Humor &amp;amp; Satire Blog&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.colbertnation.com/video&#039; onclick=&quot;trackOutboundLink(&#039;###CATEGORY###&#039;, &#039;www.colbertnation.com/video&#039;, &#039;###LABEL###&#039;)&quot;&gt;Video Archive&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.geeksugar.com/Stephen-Colbert-Cell-Phone-Radiation-Video-17573476#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/Video">Video</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/Stephen Colbert">Stephen Colbert</category>
 <category domain="http://www.geeksugar.com/tag/The Colbert Report">The Colbert Report</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:49:37 PDT</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>GeekSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.geeksugar.com/Stephen-Colbert-Cell-Phone-Radiation-Video-17573476</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

